El Bulli, Roses, Spain [Review]

El Bulli

5/5

We went up smelling of Roses. You shoelace up the hill, past rock, scrub and dirt, the heaving sea, and the tapas-and-sangria town shrinking beneath. This is a destination in both senses: worth a journey on its own, and you’d always travel to get here – you’d never just pop in, even if you could.

 

And you really couldn’t. In specific foodie circles, in the interorbital centre of that little Venn diagram, a table at El Bulli is easily the most coveted in the world. It’s the reservation grail, it’s Dorsia. A typical goggle-eyed statistic states that two million people apply every year for 8000 covers – a figure that either makes you fear for our species (it’s only a bloody restaurant, after all) or, if you’re of a more curious bent, increases the draw and mystique of the place.


So when I announced to my chirpy clique of food-loving friends that a gorgeous miracle of a human being – a reader of this blog, to boot – had offered me his table, behind the rictus smiles and hollow congratulations was the seething stench of ill-masked fury: you lucky, lucky sod.


And Jack, once again, thank you.


 

Criticism thrives on similarities and differences, chugs along on oppositions, syncopates on links and gaps between As and Bs. Relation is all. Restaurant reviews often come to life when they answer two questions: what’s this like, and what’s it not like? But that’s impossible with El Bulli. I can’t tell you what it resembles: it doesn’t resemble anything. If I say it serves food, that only increases the chasmic distance between reality and definition: often, it doesn’t even register as food, and certainly doesn’t look like it. It’s rootlessly unwieldy, sprawlingly unmanageable, slippery as a Cussons in a tub of glycerin.


Of course, it’s spawned acolytes, and you can eat pallid approximations of its food from chefs who’ve done a stage here, you can see apings of technique and experiment, the pervading, brass-rubbed influence. Every cuckoo-spit foam swamping every ponced-up plate in every self-regarding restaurant on earth frothed ultimately from this mothership. But nobody, including Heston Blumenthal, creates – I can’t say ‘cooks’ – with the rubber-necking aplomb of Ferran Adrià, or shares the same wilful difference, the pathological desire to be relentlessly, exorbitantly, obtusely unique. (And a brisk tsk to anyone who says that ‘unique’ is an either-or word – I think you know what I mean.)

You don’t expect it to be here, though. The location of the ‘best restaurant in the world’, as it’s usually called, is as unexpected and strange as its food. I hadn’t been to the Costa Brava before, and I don’t know when I’ll be back. Most of the late-summer tourists were French, and every English or American voice we heard, we heard again in the restaurant.


But in a sense, El Bulli could be anywhere. Its dinners follow no pattern, have no basis in region or style, no comfort zone. Across 38 courses, most of them eaten with our fingers in a bite or two, we swung from sweet to savoury and back, the dishes oscillating from ambient to frozen to hot to frozen again, in a geographically scattergun parade, a mad method. Sometimes there were Asiatic notes of yuzu and soy (as in the above dish of raw cockles); sometimes there were variations on a single ingredient – almond or soy; sometimes there were reworkings of traditional things. For example, a submarine roll stuffed with egg and beef turned out to be a savoury meringue sandwiching truffle shavings, almonds and spots of egg yolk. The double-take, the opposition between eye and tongue, were clever and delicious – and not some party trick or silly gimmick. It was a skilled and lovely dish, an adroit assembly of harmonious ingredients in a form that hooked and drew several senses.

 

The famous ‘spherical olives’ did something similar. They’re balls of agar jelly, a bit bigger than broad beans, encasing olive oil. You put one in your mouth and it gloops and blobs across your tongue; there’s a gentle, Freudian pleasure in passing this round the palate, the sensation of sliding it into the gaps between jaw and cheek, the liquid loll across the tastebuds. They have a whispering fragrance of olives, but really they’re just playful bubbles – the pleasure is in the soft, ovoid texture more than the flavour. But then you press one gently against the roof of your mouth – there’s no urge to bite or chew – and it bursts. And fills and swamps your palate, drenches your tongue and soaks your grinning gob in the sheerest essence of olive, the smooth, oozing bitterness of the fat green fruit, the grassy, ancient flavours lingering, lingering, lingering. And though you’ve tasted olives, this is pure olive, ur-olive, better than God’s olives, and simply incredible.

 

Other things: deep-fried tuna roe: hot, sweet and maternally milky, comforting as an old quilt. A single langoustine severed down the middle (presumably while still alive), then cooked to lie straight as Franco’s architecture, with variations on sesame for its head-meat. Raw rose petals laid out like artichokes with an artichoke sauce: like old lady’s perfume, and bordering on unpleasant. ‘Pond’: a dank briney puddle of sea anenome and caviar, tasting of the stinking, slippery things that lurk in lagoons. Or ‘Roots’: chocolate and dark fruits assembled to look like a tree yanked from the earth and then inverted, the soily powders falling to the plate in dark dusty heaps of cocoa.

 

Some of it was perfect. A deep-fried chicken skin smeared in a slick of concentrated chicken sauce; abalone with pork fat and shimeji mushrooms; ‘cherries’ metamorphosed into miniature balls filled with kirsch. A dish of lamb kidney with camomile made little sense to me, but it was a rarity, and doesn’t dim the triumphs of this meal.

People tie themselves in irrelevant knots debating whether El Bulli counts as art or craft. It’s both, of course: and science, and more. Its unworldliness provides the encouragement and perspective necessary to ask fundamental questions about the act of eating. The restaurant challenges almost every assumption we lazily swallow about food, queries every apathetically inherited kitchen tradition, every ragged culinary hand-me-down. Food is so often petrified in deferential custom that we never pause to ask why method or technique or recipe are as they are. Adrià’s obsessive innovation makes anyone with a passing interest in what they eat wonder why sweet food should necessarily appear at the end of a meal; it lets them question the merits of a eugenic belief in terroir. The food here combines the familiar and the unfamiliar in stunning synchrony, but though there’s a palpable delight in surprise and pleasure, it’s never about showing-off or wizards and curtains. Dinner at El Bulli reminds us plainly and honestly that eating is as much emotional and intellectual as it’s physical – and that’s a hell of a lesson to take back home.

 

 

El Bulli, Caja Montjoi, Nr. Roses, Spain


See on the Map

 

Reservations via email only, usually in October for the subsequent season: bulli@elbulli.com

 

http://www.elbulli.com/

 

All pictures mine except the first shot, courtesy of TripAdvisor, and the second shot, courtesy of About.com

 

 

 

>Le Vacherin, Chiswick, London

>Le Vacherin

★★★★★

If ever they come for me in the middle of the night – figures round the bed, door in splinters, torchlights red on sweaty face – I know what I’ll fight them for. I know what’ll get me wriggling and writhing, the thought that’ll fling me out the door, unshod, to curses and flurry. (Admittedly, as this blog continues, the only part of me capable of producing any movement is my bowel, but that’s beside the point.) What is it?

Bistro.

Richer, tastier, bistro best. The elemental warmth of lobster bisque, the saucy soul of coq au vin. Pork baked in milk, clafoutis pocked with cherries, a benchmark moules – I’d fight them on the beaches for it.

But that’s the French for you. Whatever barnacle-nosed colonels harrumph into their port, the French are better than the English at everything. Their cities are more beautiful, they’ve got beaches and ski slopes and space, they’ve got Zidane and we’ve got Rooney, they’ve got a national cinema and we’ve got Richard Curtis. They’re better looking, they work less, and they live longer. And we all know they eat better. Britons survive on curly fries, Frijj and unsweetened apology: the French eat brioche. Don’t talk to me about service, either. For every supercilious garçon I’ve done battle with, I’ve faced two nose-ringed trollops dropping the plates and flobbing in the minestrone.

Now London has some decent British restaurants, most of which suckled at the teat of St. John. (Which is not a phrase you’ll read in the Catholic Encyclopaedia.) For the most part, though, our cooking is a stay-at-home girl, shredding her suet by the whisper of the Aga and the fart of the Labrador. Like everything in Britain, the best and most interesting food remains aspiced in class, primly reserved for metropolitan sorts who’ll eat a Mrs King pork pie or pay seven quid for bone marrow and parsley salad. In France, it’s different. There’s self-assured pride – often mistaken for arrogance – in a national granary of dishes, which everybody knows and which you can eat throughout the country. Food remains the bottom-up, bottoms-up bedrock of their culture, and they’re richer for it.

Le Vacherin – for all that its chef is British – is proof enough of French superiority. It’s an outstanding restaurant serving considered bistro fare with panache, confidence and honesty – clubbable, composed and as unpretentious as a skip. I took my friend Cargy for a long lunch, unaware that on Sundays, it’s prix fixe only. (A bizarre policy – I’m invariably coaxed in by set lunches but veer onto the à la carte within moments of arriving.) It’s in Chiswick, which sounds like it might as well be Vladivostock, but is only an anvil’s throw from Hammersmith.

£19.50 gets you three courses. I start with a junipery morteau sausage with lentils, the pig given life by the pulse (droll, that one). It’s rustic in a polished sort of way. Cargy has a stellar pork rillette, the lightest I’ve ever tasted. There’s a lid of set fat which she detaches to limit her lard intake – though I finish it – and some cornichons to bring vital acidity. Rabbit in mustard sauce is faultless – toothsome clumps of bunny falling from spindly bones. A green salad crunches with endive, bitter as Al Gore, and there’s a firm, pearly piece of sea bream, cloyed by a slightly over-rich lobster sauce. For puddings, a haughty île flottante, the whites not dissimilar to candyfloss, in a custard haunted with vanilla. Last, an exquisite apple tatin to share, the pastry flaked with jammy gooeyness, the prim fruit carrying just a little, welcome bite.

Now it’s true that I’ve only been once, for the lunch deal. And if I’d come for a midweek dinner, and spent £18 on lamb navarin with boulangères, I’d have judged the place by different standards. But I ate what I ate here, and I paid what I paid – and on that basis, this was my best London meal so far this year.

We took our wine outside, as people bronzed on Turnham Green and the sun stood poised in the evening sky. It’s wrong, two-and-two-is-five-wrong, to dismiss or patronise Le Vacherin as a neighbourhood restaurant. If it were in Chelsea, it would be more famous and the tables would be harder to get. But it isn’t, which is why you can get three delicious courses for 20 quid. And that’s the reason you should go there this Sunday.


Le Vacherin, 76-77 South Parade London, London W4
Tel. +44 (0)20 8742 2121

See on the Map


Sunday lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs £39

Le Vacherin on Urbanspoon

www.levacherin.co.uk

>L’Astrance, Paris

>L’Astrance

★★★★★

The signature at l’Astrance looks like a strange sort of pie. Layer after layer of mandolined white mushrooms and slivers of apple, bulked and buffed by foie gras steeped in verjuice. There’s a slick of hazelnut oil to bring balance and depth, and a shining splot of roasted lemon. It looks weird and unsettling, like the greyish muck a vegetarian eats at Christmas – but pierced, flaked and fluttering on the tongue, it’s astonishing.

I’d always thought that the point of foie gras was its silken fattiness, that the most exquisite livers teeter just this side of disgusting. But here, the soily bite of the raw fungi, the vibrance of verjuice and lemon, the little dusting of mushroom powder, bring an exuberant, almost trivial lightness to the meat.

That’s the extraordinary thing Pascal Barbot does. His food is classically French in that it retains a solemn respect for ingredients, that everything on the plate justifies its inclusion, that surgical care and cultivated dexterity are behind every dish. But there’s none of the swamped pappiness you get from roux-based saucing, the stodged, stultifying luxury of a typical tasting menu. Nouvelle cuisine began modernising French cooking some decades ago, but anyone who’s visited Paris recently will have seen how hard such habits die.

L’Astrance is supposedly the city’s most elusive reservation: a single dining room with just 26 covers, and three stars in the Guide Rouge. Controversially – if only because rich people tend to enjoy ordering waiters about – there’s no menu. Well, not quite. You choose whether you want three, five or seven courses, detail any ridiculous diets or confected allergies, and the kitchen does the rest. There isn’t even a wine list, although the front of house does boast Gault Millau’s sommelier of the year.

The dining room is bright rather than frivolous, comfortable rather than cushy, with darkly silvered walls and splashes of yellow and gold. Bread from Poujauran arrives instantly, and is some of the best I remember eating – open-crusted, with a musty, startlingly sour taste, although the butter is much too salty. The first amuses are a slice of somewhat overcooked brioche with a dab of rosemary cream, and a teaspoon of Parmesan purée. It seems initially a gloopy, over-rich start, like beginning with the cheese course. But the point is made clear by the second amuse, a shot of pea soup with ginger foam. The spice blasts the soup like a defibrillator, balancing that initial cheesiness, and setting the scene for what follows.

Shockingly tender, a langoustine and a prawn are pinkly brothed in a crustacean fumet with a whisper of peanut. Blooming with petals, it’s among the most beautiful things I’ve ever eaten. Then a generous flop of monkfish with asparagus stalks thick as marker pens, a zipping citric sauce and an Asiatic quenelle of mango and papaya. Beside them is a razor clam imbued with garlic and thyme, the flavours floating like mist from the rubbery mollusc. Then red mullet with beetroot leaf and a nasty sauce made with fermented anchovies, smelling like rotten mackerel, piscine and algae green, choking the rouget.

A perfect nubbin of suckling pig is next, with pocked morels textured like tripe. A couple of foams make an appearance here, and for once their spawny lick brings something to a dish. Last of the savouries is a homage to pigeon: breast, thigh – trimmed so we can eat from the bone – and liver, with the sweetest, tiniest mangetout, no bigger than your thumbnail.

A sorbet of lime and chilli grabs us like a bear-hug, fresh and sparking with delicate heat. Then a witty pudding instead of cheese. What looks like a log of goat’s turns out to be tubular meringue wrapping purées of pistachio and red fruit; and then a passion fruit tart bleeding such concentrated flavour, it takes my breath away. Coffee, cognac, petits fours of jasmine egg-nog served in eggshells, hazelnut madeleines, fresh fruit, and we’re done.

Typically, after a lunch this size, I hoist my capacious bottom from its seat and waddle away, plump as a brandy-soaked raisin. Certainly, we ate well here, but there was an equilibrium to the meal, a deft amalgam of generosity and poise, which meant we could potter under Eiffel’s nearby tower without the rinsed bloating that typically follows a degustation. Barbot’s cooking is proof enough against those who sound the knell for French food and its pre-eminence. He treats ingredients as the French always have: absorbing, adapting, melding, and he does so with judicious, wholly individual flair. I’d go so far as to wager that this clean, globalised approach represents the future of French cooking. And I find that hugely exciting.

L’Astrance, 4 Rue Beethoven, 75016 Paris
Tel.: +33 (0)1 4050 8440

Lunch or dinner costs between €70 and €290pp, depending on menu and wines.

http://www.lastrance.abemadi.com/

>Terroirs, Charing Cross, London

>Terroirs
★★★★★


Awful name, Terroirs. It’s that niggling, wriggling little plural, the silent S gilding an already ponced-up lily. The word’s yet to enter anything like ordinary English, of course, and remains a fairly prissy piece of jargon – a loanword adopted cautiously, as you might a young offender. Try to Anglicise it, though, say it in an English accent, and you sound like Lloyd Grossman. Tear-warr. Scientific research – I will not disclose my methods – leads me to conclude that only 13.6 per cent of the British public has the slightest clue what it means. As a name for a restaurant, then, Terroirs is about as democratic as Chad. And for the few who do know it, it’s a daft bit of underselling by the wine merchant owners, a misbranding on the scale of Woolworth’s ‘Lolita’ range of kiddie furniture. Because ‘terroir’, reeking as it does of swill and spittoon, of noble rot and pigeage entre-deux-mers, implicitly suggests that food here plays second fiddle to plonk. Which it doesn’t.

The restaurant opened six months ago but has been shamefully underreviewed, no doubt in part due to this barmy ‘wine bar’ marketing. It doesn’t even have a proper website, just (like Jesus) a ‘Coming Soon’ message. As the first photo shows, the exterior is understated to the point of concealment; and despite being a Molotov cocktail’s throw from Trafalgar Square, it’s pretty hard to find. You can imagine tourists shuffling past, staled and stupefied by the National Gallery: rattled parents tugging slack-jawed ten-year-olds, seeing the name and assuming it sells dogs.

I went with London Eater and the editor of Metrotwin, a crafty website that links Big Smoke with Big Apple. It was a magnificent lunch. The wine list, which naturally deserves attention, places emphasis on small growers and biodynamic producers, and has a groaning rack of organic bottles. The menu is self-consciously arresting, rustically artful, utterly du moment. Small, tapas-style plates are very vogueish right now, with Bocca di Lupo doing a similar thing. It’s a concept that caters for the picky, the sociable, the pinched and the stingy alike. Here, depending on wallet and appetite, you nibble or scoff. There are bar snacks priced at a couple of quid, several small dishes at £4 to £9, or half a dozen main courses, each under £15. There’s also a good selection of charcuterie and some cheeses, the latter £3.50 apiece. In short, it’s a place that comfortably allows for a drink and a nibble, a medium snack, or a substantial meal. You can guess which one we plumped for.

In fact, we order so much it’s almost embarrassing. From the bar snacks, cervelle de canut, ‘silk worker’s brain’, a base of fromage blanc muddled by vinegar, is a delight: refreshing and milky, drizzled with what I’m pretty sure is walnut oil, and dressed with tiny rings of chive. Another taster, though, is a let-down. Duck scratchings, which sounded promising, are crisped boils, bitty explosions of cold grease. Amongst the smaller plates, steak tartare is available with or without heat: we order it spicy, and though it lacks an appreciable kick, it’s fresh, eggy and sharp, budded with a capery tang and excellent on hot toast. A pricey (£9) bunch of new season asparagus is perfectly cooked – so many places underdo it nowadays – with a vibrant splodge of hollandaise.

Bone marrow with truffle (oil, naturally) is the best dish of all: jellied discs of tissue wobbling like the busts on can-can dancers, dotted on a thickly foresty duxelle. Clams steamed in vermouth are plump and juicy, in a delicate, wormwoody sauce with grassy currents of parsley and a garlicky dollop of aioli. A pot-roast quail with braised artichokes is mellowed yellow, the bird of an infant tenderness, in a sauce salty with pancetta and with that curious sweet-and-sour note of the thistle. Puddings too, of course: a clever crèpe made with a caramel of salted butter, double-taking the tongue; and the best panna cotta I’ve ever had, quivering like a dumped lover’s bottom lip, its vanilla richness sliced by blood oranges steeped in Campari.

London badly needed a place like this, dextrously serving honest, compelling food in a sociable and unpretentious setting. The concept, for want of a better word, is as up-to-date as the Speaking Clock. The young chef is Ed Wilson, who trained with the Galvin brothers and who somehow produces everything from an open-plan kitchen slightly larger than a hankie, with just a couple of electric griddles and not even any gas. Pricing is ludicrously low for a restaurant of this calibre. The current lunch deal is a tartiflette, a green salad and a glass of ingenious white for ten measly pounds. I’m going back next week.

Now, any suggestions for a new name?


Terroirs, 5 William IV Street, London WC2

Tel. +44 (0)20 7036 0660

See on the TFYS Map

Indefensibly large lunch for three, including drinks and service, costs £138

Terroirs on Urbanspoon