>Seven Park Place, St James’s, London [Review]

>Seven Park Place

2/5

Just had swine flu. What a mare. One minute you’re trotting around, snouting about London and feeling just swill, and the next you’re on the straw squealing like someone out of Defoe. Last Sunday, I had lunch with relatives (my own), troughing away like a pig in proverbial – but went home with a lardy shiver and encroaching dread. Woke up on Monday feeling someone yanking my eyeballs into my brain while cattle-prodding my temples and heaping bar-bells on my belly.

The worst thing about the pigsick is you’re not sure what it might mean. People laugh at it now in that over-hearty, over-loud, phew-that-was-a-close-one way: they’re saying it’s as hyped as, I don’t know, Cheryl Cole – but then you get it and there’s a gnawing, unpalatable sense that you might, er, die. Anyway, I did the sensible thing and barricaded myself in my room, tanked on Tylenol, watching Haneke films for cheer and solace.

The worst of it’s gone now – thanks for asking – but it’s left me with a cough like a Chinese miner and a throat made of razors and a Victorian bellows. And – sorry if this is a bit TMI but it’s the only way we can syncopate into the next bit – it means I hoik up sputum the colour of -

The sofas at Seven Park Place. Horrid. They’re this emphysemal brown, a not-of-the-newest fish dye, stretching across the fabric like fake tan and a facelift. But their hideousness is as nothing to the rest of the room. ‘Busy’ might be your initial handheld adjective – but it’s much, much worse than that: it’s busier than Peter Mandelson. Some ghastly interior designer has frotted and coiffed everything to within an inch of its life. Arriving, and shrieking inwardly at the décor, I nearly turned tail and fled that instant – all things considered, it might have been better if I had.

Seven Park Place is in St James’s, a part of town I know pretty well but in which, oddly enough, I haven’t reviewed a restaurant before. I went with a mate who works nearby, and walked him back to his office after lunch. Shuddering sights. Taut, frozen brows of termagant wives with Hillary hair and horrible dogs. Porty portlies stumbling out of Boodle’s with pocket-squares askew. Ken Clarke. This is an entitled area with a pinstriped froideur: straitened by recession, though the clubbables and hedgies are siring cash again in back-scratching contentment.

The restaurant occupies a space once held by Andaman, Dieter Muller’s cactus-flower place (pretty, prickly and died a quick death) on the ground floor of a lugubrious ‘boutique’ hotel round the back of The Ritz. The chef is William Drabble, who was at Aubergine for many years (I had my 21st there – not my choice), several of them under Uncle Gordon’s tutelage.

Drabble’s food is Croesus- or Creosote-rich: he’s aiming to poach the chaps from clubland’s ‘coffee’ rooms (which are actually dining rooms) and their Alpine ‘smoking’ rooms, so it’s all heavy, heavy… heavy. Almost everything comes with a superfluous dollop of something thick and gooey, as if some smotheringly munificent milkmaid were at the pass. High-end food so often stumbles at this point: that overkill garnish, that gild on the coulis, creates something much less than the sum of its parts.

For example, this amuse:

A disc of tuna spiked and numbed with Szechuan pepper, some flayed and naughty little tomatoes, a shimmer of basil, cucumber leaves for looks and a blob of avo purée. Perfect. But there’s an extra creamy dollop adding nothing – just white superfluous richness, a glob of cloying fat, clottingly, clot-headedly unnecessary.

Similar: langoustine tortellini with roasted cauliflower and truffle butter sauce. (Already sounds subatomically light, no?) It was OK, but underneath it lay this wallpaper paste, this thick pappy swamp of cauliflower purée, as welcome as a sombre vet with a big needle. It’s all, as they say, too much.

There were exceptions. I’ll hymn here an encomium to my grouse, which was the best I’ve had this season (and the last, too) – breasts of blood and earth, in a thunkingly brilliant blackberry sauce, the giblets and legs minced and deep-fried in a breaded puck. But skate wing in black butter was singularly disastrous. Overcooked to rigid repellence and completely underseasoned, it was like chewing on rubbery iron filings, mush and dust in the mouth. My friend sent it back, rightly, and they brought him a good duck confit with orange sauce. Puddings were entirely forgettable, and looked like abstracts you’d buy in Habitat.

In a half-empty restaurant with 30 covers, with aspirations for stars and badges, these pulse-bleeps of triumph and disaster won’t do. There’s altogether too much to criticise at Seven Park Place, too much at fault, too many fundamental errors. At the end, I asked my chum to sum it up. ‘Skate tasted of paper. Loos were quite nice.’

Seven Park Place, St James’s Hotel, London SW1A
Tel. +44 (0)20 7316 1600
See on the Map

Lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs £60 – £90

Website

Seven Park Place by William Drabble on Urbanspoon

>The Restaurant at St. Paul’s, London [Review]

>The Restaurant at St. Paul’s

★★★☆☆

IRL, as we kids of the Internet say, I work near St. Paul’s. I’ve been there nearly two years, and they’ve been doing up the cathedral since I arrived. They needed to – the Portland columns were smogged, the walls Blitz-scarred and dowdy. Rain had muted the statues; Wren’s great dome curved like a grey, grubby bosom.

Goethe called architecture ‘frozen music’. If that’s true, St. Paul’s is a crystallised Bohemian Rhapsody, a Barock opera, vast as a kraken, roaring about judgement (‘Spare him his life!’), mantrically echoing (‘Bismillah! … Bismillah!’) and preaching about Beelzebub and devils put aside. At times in its history, St. Paul’s, too, has been full of Queen, and like the song, it’s draped in frippery, palpably ridiculous, gaspingly accomplished, imbricated with quirk and nuance, and most importantly, most purely, thrillingly and immovably – it’s camp.

A bundle of contradictions, that cathedral. It’s the religious radio tower of the nation, the monument to what’s left of our church, to 500 bumbling years of genteel, drably understated, limply muscular Christianity. But the triumphalism of Paul’s, its swaggering, cocksure foppishness, are utterly un-English. Wren’s hybrid Baroque is as ridiculous as a Fabergé egg in a cup of Cornish blueware. We Brits prefer the decent, stout and quiet, the making-do-and-mending, stiff-lipped diligence of a fair day’s work for a fair day’s modest pay. St. Paul’s is vulgarly popish, gaudy as a billionaire’s girl.

Which is why I love it, of course, and why I welcome the opening – amidst the revamp – of a restaurant in its crypt. That’s a ghoulish word, but the location isn’t. They’ve made superb use of the space, which is airy, bright and high-ceilinged; and the wide windows and split-level, the glass-walled kitchen and the clean, Nordic-ish furniture, bring a cool-in-summer, warm-in-winter aesthetic.

The menu is British. Stoutly, Monty Pythonishly British. They list the prices in – brace yourself – ‘British pounds’, which should come with a gigantic, flashing ‘WTF?’ sign. As opposed to, er, the Sudanese pound? The Saint Helenian pound? Other pointless affectations include an offer of ‘Forgotten Vegetable – Runner Beans’. Forgotten by whom? But the attention to detail is impressive – decent cutlery, hessian napkins, Riedel glasses, comfy chairs.

I went with Tim Hayward, one of the country’s best food writers, for a thoroughly decent lunch. I kicked off with a salad of wood pigeon and pointed cabbage: now there’s a brassica we don’t see enough of these days. It was a lovely, nouvelle-cuisiney salade tiède: the pigeon warm from the pan, its flesh squidgy and bloody. A few grapes were a smart addition, and green fans of flat-leafed parsley brought a pleasant grassy bitterness. This was a delicious, almost unimprovable dish. For once, I wasn’t hoovering up other people’s food, but Tim’s salad of squid, peas and chilli looked exactly the kind of midsummer plate you’d want to eat here.

A fillet of sea trout was slightly overcooked, though its salad of yellow bean, fennel and verjuice (the condiment du jour, it seems) was inventive, fronded with dill. Tim’s beef fillet tail, too, looked like it had got a bit familiar with the stove, but they didn’t ask how he wanted it cooked, and beef is seldom as rare as you’d like it when the kitchen decides. Nor did they notice they’d cracked the little Kilner jar of horseradish, and that shards of glass were scattered across the plate – though they handled the issue professionally. An Eton mess was bog-standard cream and dust, and an ice cream sandwich OK. At 20 ‘British pounds’ for the three courses, this is value that tends towards the excellent. The Restaurant at St. Paul’s is doing almost everything right, and almost everything better than you’d expect.

In Oxford, a 19th century church has been converted into a bar called Frevd (pronounced Freud – presumably the V / U stuff seemed a good idea at the time). Oddly enough, the church was called St. Paul’s. When the developers arrived in the late Eighties, they met with strop and bluster from the normally mild-mannered curates of that old, churchy town. And it’s hard to blame the chaplains: they knew what was coming. In the vaunted chancel of that second-rate bar, I’ve seen chaps lick canned whipped cream from the bellies of Freshers’ Week strumpets, and towards the nave, I’ve watched urinals overflow with sick.

I’m no fan of organised religion, but if the church wants to save itself – and, let’s face it, it must be pretty desperate to stick a café-diner in this consecrated basement – it has only one option. Relight hellfire. Put Father Arnall back in the pulpit. Tell the worms where they squirm. Every society in which religion is ascendant presents human existence as a simple binary: supplicate or burn. Treat people as sheep, and watch them flock and grovel in the pews.

But until the trumpet sounds, we can enjoy the fact that we’re hale, nourished and free. And knowing that, we should go to restaurants like this one for lingering lunches, and fill our cups to the brim.

The Restaurant at St. Paul’s, St. Paul’s Churchyard, London EC4
Tel. +44 (0)20 7248 0269

See on the Map

Lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs £40

All pictures mine except the exterior shot, courtesy of Guardian Travel.

http://www.restaurantatstpauls.co.uk/

The Restaurant at St. Paul's on Urbanspoon

>The Anchor & Hope, Southwark, London [Review]

>The Anchor & Hope

★★☆☆☆


People who fancy themselves restaurant experts tend to bang on about The Anchor & Hope. ‘Have you been to The Anchor & Hope?’ they meaningfully demand of anyone who claims to enjoy eating out. Nope. ‘Oh, but you must. You really, really must.’ They make it sound like a recommendation, a friendly piece of advice. But make no mistake: The Anchor & Hope is one of the yardsticks by which the food Nazis assess you. You don’t measure up if you haven’t been – so I got myself down there quicker than quick.

It’s a gastropub. And almost without exception, gastropubs are awful. Flailing, calculated defences against squeezing margins and bogofing supermarkets. Nothing to do with hospitality. Pubs were built to serve nothing more complex than a communal ashtray of Bombay Mix. So all that skimped, flimsy catering equipment set up in hastily-revamped, rat-filled basements, in dirty old loos, upstairs broomcupboards and beer-garden sheds, those menus jotted down on beermats: it’s a slapdash skin-graft pubs are far better without. No wonder the food is always terrible. Sticking gastro- onto a nice old -pub is like putting a plastic strap on a Rolex.

When I began learning to drink – and it’s something I’ve learned rather well – ‘salmon steak on a bed of rice’, hormone-and-gristle burgers, and ‘Medditterranean vegetable tart’ were just appearing on pub menus, as welcome and appropriate as a stag-night hooker at the wedding. In spawning the gastropub, we jettisoned one of the core, not-just-for-tourists things that defined us as a nation – for rubbery mussels and tapeworm spaghetti. Saddest of all, at the precise moment the inklings of a British culinary revival seemed to be taking place, publicans shunned the very food that would have best suited their premises and their customers. When was the last time you saw steak and kidney pudding on a pub menu? And what about ‘Thai green curry’?

Admittedly, the menu at The Anchor & Hope is better. The restaurant is in the same lonely slump of Southwark as The Wine Theatre (closing soon, we hope, to boos and chucked tomatoes). Its space is markedly depressing – dark and dour as bracken; so we sat outside. This is another of St. John’s progeny, but without the austere charm and self-assured invention of the parent.

‘Gazpacho’ looks like an enthusiastic toddler picked up handfuls of stuff lying around the kitchen and dumped them over the soup. How the hell are you supposed to eat it? Croutons, egg, onions, parsley and worst of all… two bloody great ice cubes melting in the middle. The soup itself, which has too much chilli, is utterly overpowered by bitter onion and grassy parsley. It’s barely an acceptable example of this great dish, and certainly no better than the one I had at Gallery Mess a couple of weeks ago.

‘Middlewhite tonnato’ is a porky reworking of the pan-Italian dish of veal with a sauce of what Elizabeth David always called tunny fish. It’s good, with acid little capers and a peppery afro of rocket. Ox heart is like chewing the face off a platypus. The meat has the texture and flavour of a well-used fly-swat. Nor is there any sign of the promised pickled walnuts.

Most grim is the priciest dish on the menu: roast pigeon with foie gras. It’s a tough and monstrous old bird, like Ann Widdecombe, and the runner beans are stringy as a harp. But these are simply ambrosia compared to the foie gras. It looks like something a woolly mammoth might cough up, or a jellyfish might menstruate. It leaches in unspeakable, sinewy globules over the pigeon, smothering all trace of flavour and texture. It’s probably the worst presentation of foie gras I’ve ever had, and it renders the dish emphatically inedible.

Puddings – thank God – are better, and hold the one delight of the meal. An elderflower jelly is perfect, one of the best things I’ve eaten this year. I’ve always loved the dew-wet, Shropshire scent of the flowers, sealed and settled by jelly. A little whipped cream and some gently poached gooseberries bring lingering, languorous flavours of summer. There’s also a tayberry ripple ice cream, which is a nice idea, although I’ve always found the tayberry the least impressive of Scotland’s soft fruits. Finally, a buttermilk pudding, which resembles a mammary implant and which tastes of gelatine-set bulimia.

The original chef of the Anchor & Hope has apparently jumped ship, and I imagine the current rudderless feel to the place will have something to do with that. This is a restaurant steered by faltering experience, propelled by the winds of reputation towards the jagged rocks of fiscal reality, with the monsters of competition thrashing beneath. It would do better to raise its anchor and set its hope on returning to its home shipyard – it would be better, in fact, as a pub.

The Anchor & Hope, 36 The Cut, London SE1
Tel. +44 (0)871 0757279

See on the Map

Lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs about £50

I can’t find a website for the Anchor & Hope. If you know of one, please let me know in the comments. Thanks.

All pictures mine except the exterior shot, which I found here.

Anchor & Hope on Urbanspoon



Edit: I changed the link to the exterior photo based on the comment below from Ewan of Pubology.

>The Fish Club, Clapham, London

>The Fish Club

★★★☆☆

My mate Patrick is off to Rwanda. Off as in off. With a rucksack full of chloroquine and naked intent, he’s gone to seek his fortune where the streets are paved with mud. A bit like Cecil Rhodes, but with fewer scruples. Most of my peers plopped from university into the professions like upended jellies. Patrick will be the hero of his own life, and I’m sure you’ll join me in wishing him well.

Six of us took him to The Fish Club, to upload him with dew-eyed memories of fish, chips and chums in Ubwongereza, which means ‘England’ in Kinyarwanda and which is not a word you’re likely to see again.

As you don’t need me to point out, The Fish Club’s problem is fish. Or rather, the lack of them. My dad, who lives abroad, orders cod and chips whenever he sees them. It reminds him of his childhood, I think, when it was cheaply, blamelessly ubiquitous. In one of the saddest about-faces of modern times, it’s now tainted, fraught with ecological dilemma. In his lifetime, 95 percent of the cod has been hoovered out the north Atlantic, and 70 percent of edible fish from the world’s oceans. Unchecked, my generation will finish off the rest. So a baby born in 2050 might never taste a seared slab of bluefin, or skate tendrils fanning in black butter, or wild, silvered bass steamed softly with lime leaves.

No doubt there’ll be many consequences of this rape and furrow in the seas, but among the saddest will be the death of the British chippy. People carp at Nobu from their well-meaning perch, but their argument flounders. Nobu will only ever form a tiny morsel of this country’s eating, while there’s a chip shop in every town. Fish and chips has been a touchingly democratic dish, loved and tweaked throughout the Kingdom (cod in the south, haddock in the north, vinegar on yours, salt and sauce on mine). We took to it more recently than roast beef, but it’s an inescapable part of who we are. And yet the chippy batters its way to oblivion.

The Fish Club claims to bring fish and chips ‘into the 21st century’. That means it uses coley. Anyone with eyes or a tongue can tell the difference between cod and coley: cod is as white as Hollywood dentistry and tastes of fleshy pearl: coley’s a deathly grey, like eating mulch and hair-shirted virtue.

The restaurant is on St. John’s Hill, that cold strip of Clapham hinterland where almost everyone I know has their starter-flat. There’s an institutionally medicinal feel to the place, the pallid blue of boarding-school sanatorium. The Fish Club isn’t sure whether it’s a take-away or a restaurant, so seats are uncomfortable and tables are shared, and a heavy funk of old oil lingers through the shop, like grandad’s Christmas fart.

The keystone, the fish and chips, is good. That coley is fresh, but the oil was slightly too cold, and the batter clings to the fish like an entrant in a wet T-shirt competition. Half the chips are idiotically spiced with cayenne, but the rest are hot and crisp. We also share a dozen or so rock oysters. They’re damp and milky at this time of the year, lacking the thwack of osmazome. A serried puck of prawns is excellent, green and Nordic with dill, and lovely on hot toast. Some shell-ons are juicy, several of them hens with roe-speckled bellies.

Perfectly-cooked bream is slathered in an oversweet chilli sauce. There’s also some lacklustre salads which we barely touch, some abysmal, grease-sodden roast veg, and a horrendous steak pie, with an interior as congealed and tepid as fresh snot. (We ordered it because one of our number had claimed he didn’t like fish. Don’t judge a man by his friends.) For puddings, a benchmark crème brûlée, a dessicated slab of Bakewell, and some decent bought-in ice cream.

I like the Fish Club. I’d be a demi-regular, I think, if I lived locally. You could eat decently for a tenner here (although we paid a lot more, over-ordering as ever). The staff are knowledgeable, chatty and warm. They’ve priced the plonk well, and it’s a sound match for the food. It was an ideal spot, really, for us to wave our white hankies at our dear departing friend. And now he’s off to eat tilapia, and – though it sounds corny – maize.

The Fish Club, 189 St John’s Hill, London SW11
Tel.: +44 (0)20 7978 7115

See on the Map

Fish, chips, mushy peas and tartare sauce for two costs £18.40.

www.thefishclub.com

Fish Club on Urbanspoon


>Gallery Mess, Chelsea, London

>Gallery Mess

★★★☆☆

Good God, what a name. Gallery Mess. It sounds like a harbinger of Emin’s bedclothes, or a Hoxton installation of upturned bins and fox poo.

And there’s something weirdly, regressively infantile about the word ‘mess’. You don’t want it anywhere near food. When a child walks into the dining room and announces, ‘I’ve made a mess’, the only sound that follows is the icy tinkle of cutlery on china, knives and forks descending in unison to half-past-six. At best, the moppet means it’s flicked peas on the floor, spattered the walls with ketchup, or smeared Petits Filous across the small, fat face of its high-chaired sibling. At worst, it means… a lot worse. Mess and food go together like surgery and LSD.

Actually, it’s ‘mess’ as in ‘officers’’ – the Grand Old Duke of York once kept his precisely numbered men on this flat section of the King’s Road. I went with limited expectations. The menu has a pussy-footed predictability: burgers, ‘pasta of the day’, ‘chargrilled chicken breast’ and the dreary like. The specials are much more interesting (Thai beef salad with snake beans, duck salad with watermelon) but weirdly don’t appear online. These days, every restaurant that changes its menu should update its website simultaneously; perhaps, on this score, Gallery Mess is a work in progress.

The space is clinical and cold, with the white monotony of a Brian Eno track. A few wildly expensive sculptures are dotted about tastefully. Chris and I sat outside, in the almost gladey courtyard, with strollers strolling past and the sun shimmying behind the planes. We had a pretty long, pretty good lunch.

Gazpacho comes with cucumber and sun-blushed tomatoes at the bottom of the bowl. Annoyingly, inexplicably, you pour the soup yourself. As you know, this can be a truly great dish, but the version here is just passable. Over-oiled and timidly flavoured, it tastes sort of deflated, with the sun-blushed tomatoes clearly blushing out of embarrassment at their unwelcome acidity. A salad of lamb’s lettuce with duck and watermelon sounded horrendous – which is, naturally, why I ordered it – but proves delicious, with splashes of carmine fruit given body by a south-east-Asiany peanut dressing. It’s possible, though I could be wrong, that the duck was leftover from yesterday. If so, all to the good: such frugal creativity is welcome these days.

A saddle of lamb is chewily overcooked, though its couscous is intelligently spiced and the dish looks delightful. Salmon poached with sauce vierge is excellent – rosy and tender, bathing in extra virgin and speckled with capers. A knickerbocker glory is bizarrely constructed with peanut brittle and bashed up crème brûlée, though its fruit bleeds juicily within. Rhubarb crumble lacks that gooey glory when fruit has surged into crust – instead, the ’barb lies morosely at the bottom of the dish, and the crumble is dusty and raw.

Overall, though, Gallery Mess is ideal for a spot of lunch after a morning shopping on the KR. Its product is far better than you’d expect in a gallery caff. If that sounds condescending, it shouldn’t: most food in museums, or any other public building, is like the Taxidermy Section crossed with the Rocks Room. The staff were smiling and enthusiastic, and seemed as happy to be in the sunshine as we were. Not really a mess at all, then.

Gallery Mess Café/Bar, Saatchi Gallery, King’s Road, London SW3

Tel.: +44 (0)20 7730 8135

See on the Map

Lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs £40

www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/gallerymess

>Le Vacherin, Chiswick, London

>Le Vacherin

★★★★★

If ever they come for me in the middle of the night – figures round the bed, door in splinters, torchlights red on sweaty face – I know what I’ll fight them for. I know what’ll get me wriggling and writhing, the thought that’ll fling me out the door, unshod, to curses and flurry. (Admittedly, as this blog continues, the only part of me capable of producing any movement is my bowel, but that’s beside the point.) What is it?

Bistro.

Richer, tastier, bistro best. The elemental warmth of lobster bisque, the saucy soul of coq au vin. Pork baked in milk, clafoutis pocked with cherries, a benchmark moules – I’d fight them on the beaches for it.

But that’s the French for you. Whatever barnacle-nosed colonels harrumph into their port, the French are better than the English at everything. Their cities are more beautiful, they’ve got beaches and ski slopes and space, they’ve got Zidane and we’ve got Rooney, they’ve got a national cinema and we’ve got Richard Curtis. They’re better looking, they work less, and they live longer. And we all know they eat better. Britons survive on curly fries, Frijj and unsweetened apology: the French eat brioche. Don’t talk to me about service, either. For every supercilious garçon I’ve done battle with, I’ve faced two nose-ringed trollops dropping the plates and flobbing in the minestrone.

Now London has some decent British restaurants, most of which suckled at the teat of St. John. (Which is not a phrase you’ll read in the Catholic Encyclopaedia.) For the most part, though, our cooking is a stay-at-home girl, shredding her suet by the whisper of the Aga and the fart of the Labrador. Like everything in Britain, the best and most interesting food remains aspiced in class, primly reserved for metropolitan sorts who’ll eat a Mrs King pork pie or pay seven quid for bone marrow and parsley salad. In France, it’s different. There’s self-assured pride – often mistaken for arrogance – in a national granary of dishes, which everybody knows and which you can eat throughout the country. Food remains the bottom-up, bottoms-up bedrock of their culture, and they’re richer for it.

Le Vacherin – for all that its chef is British – is proof enough of French superiority. It’s an outstanding restaurant serving considered bistro fare with panache, confidence and honesty – clubbable, composed and as unpretentious as a skip. I took my friend Cargy for a long lunch, unaware that on Sundays, it’s prix fixe only. (A bizarre policy – I’m invariably coaxed in by set lunches but veer onto the à la carte within moments of arriving.) It’s in Chiswick, which sounds like it might as well be Vladivostock, but is only an anvil’s throw from Hammersmith.

£19.50 gets you three courses. I start with a junipery morteau sausage with lentils, the pig given life by the pulse (droll, that one). It’s rustic in a polished sort of way. Cargy has a stellar pork rillette, the lightest I’ve ever tasted. There’s a lid of set fat which she detaches to limit her lard intake – though I finish it – and some cornichons to bring vital acidity. Rabbit in mustard sauce is faultless – toothsome clumps of bunny falling from spindly bones. A green salad crunches with endive, bitter as Al Gore, and there’s a firm, pearly piece of sea bream, cloyed by a slightly over-rich lobster sauce. For puddings, a haughty île flottante, the whites not dissimilar to candyfloss, in a custard haunted with vanilla. Last, an exquisite apple tatin to share, the pastry flaked with jammy gooeyness, the prim fruit carrying just a little, welcome bite.

Now it’s true that I’ve only been once, for the lunch deal. And if I’d come for a midweek dinner, and spent £18 on lamb navarin with boulangères, I’d have judged the place by different standards. But I ate what I ate here, and I paid what I paid – and on that basis, this was my best London meal so far this year.

We took our wine outside, as people bronzed on Turnham Green and the sun stood poised in the evening sky. It’s wrong, two-and-two-is-five-wrong, to dismiss or patronise Le Vacherin as a neighbourhood restaurant. If it were in Chelsea, it would be more famous and the tables would be harder to get. But it isn’t, which is why you can get three delicious courses for 20 quid. And that’s the reason you should go there this Sunday.


Le Vacherin, 76-77 South Parade London, London W4
Tel. +44 (0)20 8742 2121

See on the Map


Sunday lunch for two, excluding drinks and service, costs £39

Le Vacherin on Urbanspoon

www.levacherin.co.uk

>The Salisbury, Fulham, London

>The Salisbury

★★☆☆☆

Of all the innumerable, pointless edicts of so-called good manners, the ‘clear your plate’ rule is undoubtedly the worst. Parents torture their children with it, forcing them to finish each last incinerated scrap, every mushy morsel of overcooked veg. It’s just cruel. And – like so much tabletop etiquette – no-one has ever offered a coherent justification for it. ‘Think of the Africans!’ shriek the bearded finger-waggers. Do they really believe it makes a difference to starving people whether diners tens of thousands of miles away stuff themselves till they explode or just eat until they’re satisfied? Of course not. The hungry want to fill their own bellies: they couldn’t care less about yours. I’d rather hear someone say ‘Give me your wallet’ than ‘Finish your plate’.

And if it’s not that, leaving anything behind is an ‘insult to the host’. What drivel. Cooks deserve to know if their food is terrible: otherwise you condemn all future guests to the same horrible experience. ‘I know my clam bake with Marmite may sound a touch odd, but it always goes down a treat.’ Dinner parties become lugubrious ordeals, dissolutions of happiness, exorcised of pleasure. All the love and generosity, the richness and giving, the great purring glow of sheltering and nourishing, vanish before bad food. I hereby launch a campaign for us, as Britons, to leave what we don’t want, and to complain loudly and embarrassingly whenever the food is bad. Restaurants and dinner parties are equally kosher. You heard it here first.

The Salisbury appeases both plate-clearers and nibblers, basing half its menu on the emetically conflicted pairing ‘English tapas’. Lots of restaurants seem to be doing this nowadays, doubtless prompted by the great R-word. The menu here is good, with a raft of interesting and exciting dishes. You have no problem ordering.

It’s a former pub not far from where I live. You can tell it was once pretty grotty, but now it’s lightly, brightly revamped, skylit and blue. It’s a pleasant dining room, actually, albeit with a slight museum caff vibe; my mum took me on one of her sadly infrequent visits from Auld Reekie.

When the food arrives, I realise The Salisbury offers the gastronomic equivalent of The Crying Game. It all looks great until… aah. One tapa is a ‘veggy Scotch egg’. Why anyone would conceive of such a thing is completely beyond me. It’s a hardish-boiled egg in breadcrumbs on a puddle of capery oil. (There’s a similar recipe in the most staggeringly pointless cookbook in living memory, but at least the author doesn’t call it a ‘veggy Scotch egg’.) Not five minutes’ walk from The Salisbury is the peerless Harwood Arms, where Stephen Williams’s venison Scotch egg is the best bar snack in London. The version here, presumably included to plump up the menu for herbivores, is a terrible idea, distractedly executed.

Chipolatas are bog-standard, their chutney unpleasantly tepid. A salad of pea shoots with feta and balsamic glaze is excellent, though: crisp and green and summery, with fresh cheese, though the vinegar does nothing for it. ‘Pete’s curry’ is tasty, smoothed with coconut milk and smoky with cumin. Gnocchi and smoked chicken are scalding globules with clumps of string. Ten quid says they came straight from the microwave. A side bowl of cabbage is faultless, basking in melted butter and spiked with infant roundels of chive.

Amongst the mains, a pie of pork, apple and cider is good, with a big honk of piggy knuckle, sealed by pastry flaking in filigrees round the edges. Mum has a crab tart with a couple of prawns. It’s steep at £12, and the tart, though well flavoured, is grossly undercooked, leaching onto the plate (an annoying wooden plank) in a slow vomity puddle. Pudding is a deconstructed strawberry cheesecake: a clutch of Elsantas with a bit of cream and some soggy Digestives mixed with butter. It looks like a rat run over by a lawnmower in the snow.

The Salisbury has a great big problem, and it’s not the food, the service, the décor or any of the other things that vex chefs and owners. Its problem is The Harwood Arms. In every imaginable respect, Williams’s incomparable pub trounces the more recent opening. And that’s a shame, and it makes my flinty heart twitch with pity, because they’ve tried hard here and they clearly mean well. But I’d cross London to eat at The Harwood Arms – and because of that, I’d think twice about crossing the road to eat here.

The Salisbury, 21 Sherbrooke Road, London SW6
Tel. +44 (0)20 7381 4005

See on the Map

Dinner for two, excluding drinks and service, costs about £60

Salisbury Tavern on Urbanspoon

Sorry about the photos this time – I forgot my camera. Proper pictures will resume in the next review.

>The Wine Theatre, Southwark, London

>The Wine Theatre

★☆☆☆☆

Here’s the winner of the monthly TFYS award for Most Boring Menu. It reads like a species of dilute Jamie Oliver, a sleepwalker’s wander down a well-wandered path. Hazily Mediterranean, Brit-friendly staples: carbonara, garlic bread, lasagne. It’s food so sterile it’s had a vasectomy, ideal for diners with the itchy-footed adventurousness of paranoid agoraphobes. How I wish the chef had enough self-respect to include just one thing with a bit of interest, a dish to snag the eye and pique the senses. I don’t know, a bottarga maybe. Or a nice piece of liver.

The Wine Theatre opened recently on an ugly road in Southwark, far from Borough’s madding crowd. When I showed up, it was bleakly deserted, and a pretty waitress was reading the Metro. ‘I’ve booked for two,’ I proffered, rather redundantly. She lifted an ambitiously large reservation book and opened it at random, to a page joyfully bereft of writing. She studied this intently, apparently scanning through hundreds of bookings. ‘Yeeess… What was the name?’

I told her, and she looked up, throwing a long gaze round the room, as though overwhelmed by the heaving bodies, bustling staff, clinking crockery, kitchen cat-calls and scraping chairs, as she searched for a tiny corner to squeeze us in among the hubbub. I looked around the empty space, which has the optimism of a dentist’s waiting room, and asked if we might sit outside. ‘Um… I think that should be fine.’ No-one else showed up.

In a breathless preamble to its menu, The Wine Theatre makes much of its ‘philosophy’, the ‘aperitivo’. There’s a great deal of branding puff around ‘aperitivo’, as if it were the most radical gastronomic concept since Theophanu, the tenth century Byzantine Empress, popularised the fork. From what I can gather, ‘aperitivo’ consists of a free nibble with your drink. Hardly the Shock of the New.

I went with Robert McIntosh, who writes Wine Conversation. He chose a deliciously light and supple Barbera d’Asti, perfect for lunchtime. Which was just as well, because this was some of the blandest food I’d eaten in ages.

Robert’s starter reeks all the way from the kitchen. It’s a noisome dish of pastey sardines and overcooked onions spattered with raisins, like fishy muesli. I have a revolting salad of squid and olives. The squid is pre-frozen and cut into stumpy fag-butts, surrendering all pretence of flavour. The olives are sliced, and straight from a tin. At what point, do you think, does someone decide an olive would taste better sliced? Do these people lie in the bath and say to themselves: ‘Olives are a perfect size to pop in your mouth. Humans have grown them for as long as they’ve grown anything. We have machines nowadays that stone them if you can’t face spitting out the pip or putting your dentures in. So the only way we can improve on this is by cutting them up into meanly astringent little slices, like caustic Polo mints, and steeping them in horrendous vinegar’?

I can’t understand the logic. Why would anyone, anywhere in the world, want to eat a sliced olive? Chopped into tapenade I well understand; stoned I can just about handle; but these are pocked, mutilated monstrosities, an insult to the noble name. The best thing about the dish is the griddled ciabatta on the side, though it makes Jadis look warm.

My main course is slightly better. ‘Fettucine with prawns’ turns out to be a clump of coldish pasta with two anaemic prawns on the side. It comes with courgettes (the menu promised rocket) which were cooked ages ago and are bracken-brown and slimey; and some chunks of cat-food tuna. The prawns weren’t prepped properly, and each carries a streak of intestinal waste down its back. Robert has a lasagne which I strangely forget to taste, though it doesn’t look bad. I finish with an amaretto crème brûlée, which had sounded interesting. But rather than spiking it with Amaretto liqueur, which I’d hoped for, they’ve crushed amaretti biscuits into the custard, a terrible idea. The soggy crumbs give it a mouthfeel like a frog spawned in it. I don’t finish it.

Some might argue that, because the restaurant has the word ‘wine’ in its name, I should make allowances for it. The drink’s the focus here, they’ll say: it’s wrong to concentrate on the food. Well, this is a food blog, and The Wine Theatre is a restaurant. Its solitary waitress is friendly and amenable, its wine list is sound, and its loos are spotless. To use a technical term, though, its food is pants. I give it six months before it’s curtains.

The Wine Theatre, 202-206 Union Street, Southwark, London SE1
Tel. +44 (0)20 7261 0209

See on the Map

Lunch for two, including drinks and service, costs £75

The Wine Theatre on Urbanspoon

www.thewinetheatre.co.uk

All pictures mine except the exterior shot, courtesy of the London SE1 Community Website

>Byron, Chelsea, London

>
Byron
★★★★☆

As the venerable poet said, ‘I like a beef-steak, too, as well as any’. Anyone except vegetarians, that is, and nobody listens to them. Contemptible bunch, vegetarians. Even the word sounds preachy and mealy-mouthed, like chewing a muddy parsnip. It took man tens of thousands of years to get to a state where he could eat flesh regularly. All those long millennia of hunting and rearing, that tortuous shift from quarry to livestock. It’s just rank ingratitude to chuck it back in the hungry, hairy faces of our Neolithic forebears. And don’t get me started on that ‘Eastern’ nonsense. If you want to eat like the Nepalese, put butter in your tea, and soy you later. Meat, meat and more meat got you where you are. Quite literally, it’s your DNA.

So anyway, Byron liked beef. As do we, especially when it’s ground, grilled, and bapped. I’ve always said that the hamburger’s the apogee of sandwiches. The Mohammed-Ali-greatest, simply-the-Tina-Turner-best. BLT, club and PB & J: they’re all honourable, but there’s nothing like a burger. Bloody and beefy, sweet, juicy, grill-scarred and fat, blackened and blistered, chewy of bun, crunchy of gherkin, splashy of mustard and ketchup.

Byron is a newish chain of high-end burger bars. You might say that London doesn’t need any more high-end burger bars. You might say, in fact, that London needs another high-end burger bar like it needs a pandemic or Jimmy Carr. But we’re stuck with them. I was kindly invited by Chris to an evening hosted by the manager of the chain, Tom Byng. Also present were Niamh, Martin and Caitlin. The obligatory disclaimer: I was, of course, sweetened and swayed; my favourable opinions were bought the instant beef crossed my palm, and my corruptibility was assured with every big, boozy slurp. With that in mind…

We ate more or less everything on the menu. Tortilla chips are crunchy and light, and though the guacamole is overpuréed and slightly underseasoned, the salsa is excellent, particularly for the time of year. Courgette fritters have a crunchy, almost pankoey batter, but are flaccid and slightly slimey. Macaroni cheese – a fine accompaniment to any burger, and I salute those who order it – is magnificent, and infinitely better than the one I had in the overpriced and hateful Bumpkin last week. Slaw is vibrant and crunchy and I want the recipe; and the ‘iceberg wedge’ (an American concept, like extraordinary rendition) is one of the most horrible dishes I’ve tried in a long while. A quartered iceberg lettuce, that Lada of vegetables, slathered in soured cream and scattered with chewy spits of bacon. A salad for people who don’t like green, for £4.50. The chips, you’ll be glad to hear, are superb, bronzed and sizzled, and pace just about every other food blogger, I like the extra flavour from the odd snippet of skin.

Here’s the beef. A mixture of rump, chuck and brisket, in proportions Tom wouldn’t reveal. All bloody good and bloody bloody, as you can see from that charred and beautifully leaking specimen above. Not overminced, exactly the right size, and pinkly, perkily cooked. I also ordered the signature Byron, which was a mistake. One of the difficulties the chain has is that, while it offers a quality product, it has to cater for people more used to the golden arches. The patties are cooked to medium as standard, but some customers refuse all meat that isn’t grey. The restaurant thus suffers a constant struggle between credibility and appeasement. The Byron sauce turns out to be thousand-island dressing, a catch-all sop to those ignorant consumers. But it’s still a fantastic burger, with a lovely X of bacon and melting, unctuous cheese. Sourcing, incidentally, is careful and clever: Aberdeen Angus, aged for three weeks, a ‘fourth-generation East End baker’ for the buns.

After a delicious knickerbocker glory – don’t ask me how I found room – I toddled home. A brilliant place and a wonderful evening. With several litres of pinot noir sloshing inside me, not to mention a stout dose of Brooklyn lager, I was distinctly merry. I almost thought I could feel a presence, strange and benign, watching approvingly from above. Who was it said the best of life is but intoxication?

Byron, 300 King’s Road, London SW3
Tel. +44 (0)7352 6040

See on the TFYS Map

Cheeseburger and fries costs £9.50, excluding service.

Other branches at Gloucester Road, Guildford, High Street Ken, Kingston and White City.

www.byronhamburgers.com

Byron on Urbanspoon

>Terroirs, Charing Cross, London

>Terroirs
★★★★★


Awful name, Terroirs. It’s that niggling, wriggling little plural, the silent S gilding an already ponced-up lily. The word’s yet to enter anything like ordinary English, of course, and remains a fairly prissy piece of jargon – a loanword adopted cautiously, as you might a young offender. Try to Anglicise it, though, say it in an English accent, and you sound like Lloyd Grossman. Tear-warr. Scientific research – I will not disclose my methods – leads me to conclude that only 13.6 per cent of the British public has the slightest clue what it means. As a name for a restaurant, then, Terroirs is about as democratic as Chad. And for the few who do know it, it’s a daft bit of underselling by the wine merchant owners, a misbranding on the scale of Woolworth’s ‘Lolita’ range of kiddie furniture. Because ‘terroir’, reeking as it does of swill and spittoon, of noble rot and pigeage entre-deux-mers, implicitly suggests that food here plays second fiddle to plonk. Which it doesn’t.

The restaurant opened six months ago but has been shamefully underreviewed, no doubt in part due to this barmy ‘wine bar’ marketing. It doesn’t even have a proper website, just (like Jesus) a ‘Coming Soon’ message. As the first photo shows, the exterior is understated to the point of concealment; and despite being a Molotov cocktail’s throw from Trafalgar Square, it’s pretty hard to find. You can imagine tourists shuffling past, staled and stupefied by the National Gallery: rattled parents tugging slack-jawed ten-year-olds, seeing the name and assuming it sells dogs.

I went with London Eater and the editor of Metrotwin, a crafty website that links Big Smoke with Big Apple. It was a magnificent lunch. The wine list, which naturally deserves attention, places emphasis on small growers and biodynamic producers, and has a groaning rack of organic bottles. The menu is self-consciously arresting, rustically artful, utterly du moment. Small, tapas-style plates are very vogueish right now, with Bocca di Lupo doing a similar thing. It’s a concept that caters for the picky, the sociable, the pinched and the stingy alike. Here, depending on wallet and appetite, you nibble or scoff. There are bar snacks priced at a couple of quid, several small dishes at £4 to £9, or half a dozen main courses, each under £15. There’s also a good selection of charcuterie and some cheeses, the latter £3.50 apiece. In short, it’s a place that comfortably allows for a drink and a nibble, a medium snack, or a substantial meal. You can guess which one we plumped for.

In fact, we order so much it’s almost embarrassing. From the bar snacks, cervelle de canut, ‘silk worker’s brain’, a base of fromage blanc muddled by vinegar, is a delight: refreshing and milky, drizzled with what I’m pretty sure is walnut oil, and dressed with tiny rings of chive. Another taster, though, is a let-down. Duck scratchings, which sounded promising, are crisped boils, bitty explosions of cold grease. Amongst the smaller plates, steak tartare is available with or without heat: we order it spicy, and though it lacks an appreciable kick, it’s fresh, eggy and sharp, budded with a capery tang and excellent on hot toast. A pricey (£9) bunch of new season asparagus is perfectly cooked – so many places underdo it nowadays – with a vibrant splodge of hollandaise.

Bone marrow with truffle (oil, naturally) is the best dish of all: jellied discs of tissue wobbling like the busts on can-can dancers, dotted on a thickly foresty duxelle. Clams steamed in vermouth are plump and juicy, in a delicate, wormwoody sauce with grassy currents of parsley and a garlicky dollop of aioli. A pot-roast quail with braised artichokes is mellowed yellow, the bird of an infant tenderness, in a sauce salty with pancetta and with that curious sweet-and-sour note of the thistle. Puddings too, of course: a clever crèpe made with a caramel of salted butter, double-taking the tongue; and the best panna cotta I’ve ever had, quivering like a dumped lover’s bottom lip, its vanilla richness sliced by blood oranges steeped in Campari.

London badly needed a place like this, dextrously serving honest, compelling food in a sociable and unpretentious setting. The concept, for want of a better word, is as up-to-date as the Speaking Clock. The young chef is Ed Wilson, who trained with the Galvin brothers and who somehow produces everything from an open-plan kitchen slightly larger than a hankie, with just a couple of electric griddles and not even any gas. Pricing is ludicrously low for a restaurant of this calibre. The current lunch deal is a tartiflette, a green salad and a glass of ingenious white for ten measly pounds. I’m going back next week.

Now, any suggestions for a new name?


Terroirs, 5 William IV Street, London WC2

Tel. +44 (0)20 7036 0660

See on the TFYS Map

Indefensibly large lunch for three, including drinks and service, costs £138

Terroirs on Urbanspoon